SISU Battr vs MaverickRE software differences

Quick takeaway:

  • SISU Battr is an add-on accountability engine that polices how your agents actually work leads inside any CRM.

  • MaverickRE is a full AI sales-performance suite that listens to calls, grades skills, and coaches agents to close more deals.

SISU Battr vs MaverickRE: What Sets Them Apart

Core Positioning

Dimension SISU Battr MaverickRE
Purpose Automate & enforce human lead-follow-up standards Diagnose & improve agent sales skills with AI
How it works Sweeps your CRM 24/7, checks if each lead has been touched per rule set; reassigns or alerts when standards slip Integrates with Follow Up Boss, records every call, uses NLP to score ∼16 metrics & runs voice-driven role-play scenarios
Key outcome More at-bats and consistent nurture, protecting ad spend Faster ramp, higher appointment rate, data-driven coaching

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Category SISU Battr MaverickRE
Lead routing & ponds Monitors any “pond”; can auto-sweep ignored leads back to pool Pro Dispatch routes new leads to best-fit agent via performance profile
Activity rules Admin sets # of calls/texts/emails day 1–10, long-term cadence; Battr enforces Rules & Alerts nudge agent if speed-to-lead or follow-up lags
AI components Rules-based monitoring + alerting (no call AI) - AI Call Grading (dead air %, ask rate, tone) - AI Sales Coach with 60+ role-play personas
Reporting At-bat counts per agent; where follow-up died; integrates to Sisu dashboards for conversion math Business-overview, YOY agent leaderboards, call-quality heat-maps, ROI per lead source
CRM dependence Works with most CRMs (FUB, BoomTown, CINC, kvCORE, etc.) Requires Follow Up Boss (other CRMs roadmap)
Pricing (2025) Early-access pricing not public; sign-up via webinar sisu youtube $99 – $149 per user / month for AI Coach; bundled tiers scale to $375+ team plans MavrickRE
Ideal buyer Team/Broker spending $25k-$100k/mo on PPC or Zillow Flex & wants bulletproof follow-up Broker/Team that needs scalable coaching, QA, and performance transparency
Strength Protects marketing ROI by enforcing lead standards youtube Closes skill gap; 5× more appts, +120% conv. cited by users intercom
Limitation No voice analysis or training; still depends on agent skill Locked to FUB; heavier per-seat cost; no task/TC module


When to Pick Which

  1. You already have Sisu for transaction management and your main pain is agents not working leads → add Battr to police activities seamlessly inside the same ecosystem.

  2. You run Follow Up Boss, care about real call quality, and want structured coaching at scale → MaverickRE adds AI coach + granular analytics out of the box.

  3. Large teams with deep pockets could run both: Battr to ensure speed/cadence, MaverickRE for skills, covering the full lead-to-agent performance loop.

Chart: Side-by-side snapshot

Comparison of SISU Battr vs MaverickRE Software Features and Pricing

Bottom line:

Choose Battr to fix lead-follow-up execution; choose MaverickRE to elevate agent sales mastery. Some brokerages may layer the two for end-to-end accountability.

Doesn't MaverickRE have a Rules and Alerts system that fixes lead follow-up execution as well? So overlap?

You're absolutely right—there is significant overlap between SISU Battr and MaverickRE's Rules & Alerts system. Both platforms tackle lead follow-up execution problems, making my earlier distinction less clear-cut than presented.

The Overlap: Both Fix Lead Follow-Up Execution

MaverickRE's Rules & Alerts does include:

  • Automated lead monitoring that checks if agents are following up within defined timeframes

  • One-click agent nudging when leads aren't being worked properly

  • Intelligent lead reassignment to other agents or lead "ponds" when standards aren't met

  • Real-time lead health dashboard showing "Past Due," "At Risk," or "Complete" status

  • Custom rules that can be tailored by lead source, type, groups, and individual agents

  • 24/7 automated enforcement of follow-up standards

This directly competes with SISU Battr's core value proposition of enforcing lead follow-up accountability.

Where They Still Differ

SISU Battr's Advantage:

  • CRM agnostic - works with any CRM system (FUB, BoomTown, CINC, kvCORE, etc.)

  • Native integration with existing SISU transaction management ecosystem

  • Focused solely on lead accountability without additional coaching overhead

MaverickRE's Advantage:

  • Integrated ecosystem - Rules & Alerts comes bundled with AI call grading, sales coaching, and performance analytics

  • More mature feature set - already deployed with 10+ proven rules out of the box

  • Call analysis integration - can trigger alerts based on actual call quality, not just activity timing

Choosing Between Lead Accountability and a Full Sales Performance Suite

You've caught an important nuance: both platforms solve lead follow-up execution. The real decision factors become:

  1. CRM flexibility - Battr works everywhere; MaverickRE requires Follow Up Boss

  2. Ecosystem preference - Stay in SISU vs. adopt comprehensive MaverickRE suite

  3. Feature depth - Pure accountability (Battr) vs. accountability + coaching + analytics (MaverickRE)

  4. Cost structure - Battr pricing TBD vs. MaverickRE's $99-149/user/month

👉 The overlap is real—teams choosing between them are essentially deciding whether they want standalone lead accountability or a full sales performance platform that includes lead accountability as one component.

Aaron Kiwi Franklin

Aaron, commonly known as Kiwi, earned his nickname due to his origins in New Zealand, where he originally hails from since 1994. He joined Ylopo in 2016 as one of the early hires and works directly under the co-founders, Howard Tager and Juefung Ge.

Kiwi holds a degree in Computer Science and a master's in Internet Marketing from USF. Prior to joining Ylopo, he successfully managed an SEO and digital marketing agency that exclusively catered to plastic surgeons.

Currently residing in Las Vegas, Kiwi enjoys a fulfilling life with his beautiful wife, Jenny. Their pride and joy is their 13-year-old son, Stirling.

Next
Next

The Modern Agent's Approach to the Art of Conversation